KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Transportation topics in KC
shaffe
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 2:51 pm
Contact:

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by shaffe »

Hoodwinked! I voted yes because it had public transit in it. Hopefully there are enough educated voters to outweigh my foolishness.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by DaveKCMO »

shaffe wrote:Hoodwinked! I voted yes because it had public transit in it. Hopefully there are enough educated voters to outweigh my foolishness.
indeed, and you're welcome!
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10210
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by Highlander »

pash wrote:I still don't undersrand why the city didn't just roll with it. The courts, the city's lawyers, Chastain—everybody agreed the ballot measures were blank checks. Why campaign against a couple of blank checks when you're looking for ways to find your rail transit system that keeps getting shot down due to your own political failures?
The Star indicated the ballot measure was "crushed". Was it? What I find amazing is that, considering that practically everyone was against it, even the instigator, 30 percent of the people still voted for it. I don't think anything gets more cut and dry then this - an open checkbook to spend money on whatever the city's whim is and it still generates considerable support.

Does that mean every ballot issue starts with 30% support regardless of what it is? It just doesn't seem like it should be that tough to get that extra 21% of the voters.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by loftguy »

Highlander wrote:
pash wrote:I still don't undersrand why the city didn't just roll with it. The courts, the city's lawyers, Chastain—everybody agreed the ballot measures were blank checks. Why campaign against a couple of blank checks when you're looking for ways to find your rail transit system that keeps getting shot down due to your own political failures?
The Star indicated the ballot measure was "crushed". Was it? What I find amazing is that, considering that practically everyone was against it, even the instigator, 30 percent of the people still voted for it. I don't think anything gets more cut and dry then this - an open checkbook to spend money on whatever the city's whim is and it still generates considerable support.

Does that mean every ballot issue starts with 30% support regardless of what it is? It just doesn't seem like it should be that tough to get that extra 21% of the voters.
Mercury is in retrograde, Highlander. That's all there is to explain this election cycle. Reason has left the equation.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by DaveKCMO »

Highlander wrote:Does that mean every ballot issue starts with 30% support regardless of what it is?
1997: Chastain saw his proposal to turn Union Station into a transportation hub that would be light-rail friendly defeated 67 percent to 33 percent.

1998: A second plan proposing light rail from Union Station to the Kansas City International Airport lost by a 55-45 percent margin.

1999: Chastain's light-rail initiative attracted only 37 percent of the vote.

2000: His light-rail proposal took only 38 percent. A separate proposal for a gondola and other Penn Valley improvement won 46 percent.

2001: The city's light-rail plan garnered just 40 percent. (not a Chastain initiative)

2002: A Chastain initiative that included light rail, streetcars and Penn Valley Park modifications won only 35 percent of the vote.

2003: Another Chastain light-rail plan attracted only 36 percent.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by DaveKCMO »

gondolas were also part of the 2006 plan, so yeah.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18238
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by FangKC »

While we laugh at the gondola aspect of Chastain's plan, they are a good option in many cities around the world. They are cheaper to install that streetcars or light rail. Because gondola cars are staggered equally, and constantly moving between stops, they can move people all the time without waiting for the next bus or streetcar. Steep grades are less an issue. Car traffic and accidents on the street don't affect them. They don't affect street traffic when they are stopped. Streets don't require dedicated lanes.

They are often good solutions when a city has to cross barriers--like a river. A gondola system might be more practical to cross the Missouri to N. Kansas City because it wouldn't require usage of a bridge.


http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/13/business/ ... transport/

http://www.wired.com/2012/11/austin-gondola/

http://mashable.com/2013/07/03/urban-gondolas/
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5536
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by moderne »

lilmited passenger capacity. inoperable in moderate winds and snowy icey weather. More of a touristy frou frou than effective urban transport.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by loftguy »

moderne wrote:touristy frou frou

The absolute moratorium on the use of this term remains in full effect.
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2296
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by rxlexi »

No real point to this comment, but man, seeing all of the fresh rail in the ground and major construction up and down Main St. has me really bummed that we don't have Phase II approved yet.

This one line, if extended to Plaza/UMKC, can transform the core of the city.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by flyingember »

FangKC wrote: A gondola system might be more practical to cross the Missouri to N. Kansas City because it wouldn't require usage of a bridge.
there's nowhere a person would want to cross the Missouri River to right now that there isn't a bridge to today.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by flyingember »

For anyone not downtown in a while I'd estimate 10 of the approx 30 total blocks of track is completed or in the process. (Judgement call since not all blocks are the same length)

Since there's some curves to do, let's call it 25% completed
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by flyingember »

the tony guy (or his site) gets further and further off.

now he's claiming that utility costs should have been covered by the TDD. Which does bring up a good point to listen to for future plans, need to be explicit about what the tax covers. it wasn't crystal clear on utilities either way with the first TDD since utility cost increases could be higher because of this project. Getting an assessment on the cost to people for the work would be smart for transparency.

but he's trying to spin the full utility cost increases as streetcar related when the utility companies have to explain the reasons for the rate increases and this is all online. it's provable that's not the case. it's quite sad.
kboish
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: West Plaza

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by kboish »

flyingember wrote:the tony guy (or his site) gets further and further off.

now he's claiming that utility costs should have been covered by the TDD. Which does bring up a good point to listen to for future plans, need to be explicit about what the tax covers. it wasn't crystal clear on utilities either way with the first TDD since utility cost increases could be higher because of this project. Getting an assessment on the cost to people for the work would be smart for transparency.

but he's trying to spin the full utility cost increases as streetcar related when the utility companies have to explain the reasons for the rate increases and this is all online. it's provable that's not the case. it's quite sad.
Here is a portion of his rant.
When we floated the "STEALTH TAX" idea during the streetcar campaign some people snickered. "STEALTH TAXES" are the hidden taxes all voters will pay whether you are on the streetcar line or not. Recently two such efforts have surfaced: KCP&L has asked for a 15.8% rate increase and MGE has requested a "infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge." We were led to believe the utility replacement costs involved with the streetcar were covered by the taxes levied in the TDD. Now here are the utility companies asking for increases not only in the TDD area but city wide, thus the 'STEALTH TAX". Unseen in the beginning but here they come and we believe this is just the the beginning. Stay alert voters, this streetcar will cost us billion$ before it is over.
There are so many things wrong with this tiny paragraph... I tried to start writing a list of things this guy clearly has no clue about, but it got to long and tiresome....

And yet this is his "job" - to sit around and comment on it.

I apologize for littering the rag with this nonsense, but unfortunately he is actually a source of information for a portion of our city who pays attention to these types of issues.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by chaglang »

Oh, Tony has to be right: up to now, KCP&L has never, ever increased rates. So it must be the streetcar's fault. :lol:

TKC and Facebook are two things my life is infinitely better without.
chingon
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3546
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: South Plaza

Re: KCMO Downtown Streetcar

Post by chingon »

Tony didn't write that, he just posts cut and paste jobs that the Citizens for Responsible Government/Show-Me Institute/Indignant Ward Parkway Corridor White Guys crowd feed him.
Post Reply